切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华心脏与心律电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 185 -187. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-6568.2018.03.019

所属专题: 文献

护理

系统化健康教育在妊娠合并心脏病患者剖宫产围手术期的应用
李霞1   
  1. 1. 266300 胶州,胶州市人民医院 妇科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-16 出版日期:2018-09-25

Application of systematic health education in perioperative period of cesarean section for patients with pregnancy complicated with heart disease

Xia Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Gynaecology, Jiaozhou People’s Hospital, Jiaozhou 266300, China
  • Received:2018-04-16 Published:2018-09-25
引用本文:

李霞. 系统化健康教育在妊娠合并心脏病患者剖宫产围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 185-187.

Xia Li. Application of systematic health education in perioperative period of cesarean section for patients with pregnancy complicated with heart disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Heart and Heart Rhythm(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(03): 185-187.

目的

探讨系统化健康教育在妊娠合并心脏病患者剖宫产围手术期的应用效果。

方法

选取2015年6月至2016年6月胶州市人民医院收治的44例妊娠合并心脏病患者作为对照组,选取2016年7月至2017年12月胶州市人民医院收治的44例妊娠合并心脏病患者作为研究组。对照组接受常规健康教育,研究组接受系统化健康教育,比较两组患者负性情绪、母乳喂养率、喂养知识达标率、喂养技巧达标率及护理满意度。

结果

两组患者干预后SAS和SDS评分均较干预前降低,研究组干预后SAS和SDS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组母乳喂养率为54.55%,研究组母乳喂养率为77.27%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组喂养知识达标率、喂养技巧达标率和护理满意度分别为75.00%(33/44)、72.73%(32/44)、79.55%(35/44),研究组喂养知识达标率、喂养技巧达标率和护理满意度分别为95.45%(42/44)、90.91%(40/44)、97.73%(43/44),组间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。

结论

系统化健康教育可有效减轻妊娠合并心脏病患者剖宫产围手术期的负性情绪,提高母乳喂养率和护理效果。

Objective

To explore the application effect of systematic health education in perioperative period of cesarean section for patients with pregnancy complicated with heart disease.

Methods

Forty-four pregnant women with heart disease admitted to Jiaozhou People's Hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were selected as control group, and 44 pregnant women with heart disease admitted to Jiaozhou People's Hospital from July 2016 to December 2017 were selected as study group. The control group received routine health education, while the research group received systematic health education. Negative emotions, breast-feeding rate, standard-reaching rate of breast-feeding knowledge, standard-reaching rate of feeding skills and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

Results

The scores of SAS and SDS after intervention in the two groups were lower than those before intervention, and the scores of SAS and SDS in study group were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). The breast-feeding rate of the control group was 54.55%, while that of the study group was 77.27%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The standard-reaching rate of feeding knowledge, standard-reaching rate of feeding skills and nursing satisfaction in the control group were 75.00% (33/44), 72.73% (32/44) and 79.55% (35/44), respectively. The standard-reaching rate of feeding knowledge, standard-reaching rate of feeding skills and nursing satisfaction in the study group were 95.45% (42/44), 90.91% (40/44) and 97.73% (43/44), respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Systematic health education can effectively alleviate the negative emotions of pregnant women with heart disease during the perioperative period of cesarean section, and improve the breast-feeding rate and nursing effect.

表1 两组患者干预前后SAS和SDS评分比较(±s,分)
[1]
王永,范远威,曹文侠,等. 丹红注射液联合多巴酚丁胺治疗慢性肺源性心脏病合并心力衰竭的临床研究[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志,2017, 5(1): 47-50.
[2]
樊小利,张军. 妊娠合并心脏病患者分娩方式选择及母婴结局[J]. 现代仪器与医疗,2017, 23(2):105-107.
[3]
吴靓. 系统化健康教育对初产妇母乳喂养及新生儿护理能力的影响[J]. 泰山医学院学报,2016, 37(5): 570-572.
[4]
王艳红,吴爱红,魏晓存,等. 妊娠合并心脏病患者不同心功能分级对妊娠结局的影响研究[J]. 实用预防医学,2017, 24(7): 836-838.
[5]
靳晴,陈雪蓉,牛兆仪,等. 妊娠合并心脏病患者不同心功能状态对心脏不良事件和妊娠结局的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2016, 20(7): 192-194.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[3] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[4] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[5] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[6] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[7] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[8] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[9] 张静, 刘畅, 华成舸. 妊娠期患者口腔诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 340-344.
[10] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[11] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[12] 王双兴, 吴永杰, 孟兵, 张宏涛, 刁美, 张辉. 微创切口联合腹腔镜同期治疗先天性心脏病合并心外畸形[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 244-249.
[13] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[14] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[15] 杭中霞, 王朝霞, 孙琴, 李妮. 血清Irisin、TSH 及Hcy 在妊娠期甲状腺功能减退症诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 265-269.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?