切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华心脏与心律电子杂志

中华心脏与心律电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01) : 7 -11. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-6568.2017.05.002

所属专题： 文献；

论著

心率减速力、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅及超敏C反应蛋白与心房颤动射频消融术后复发的相关性研究
宋玮1, 周发展1, 闫文菊1, 郭忠秀1, 丰伟2, 张焕轶1,†()   
  1. 1. 271000　泰安，山东省泰安市中心医院心内科
    2. 271000　泰安，山东省泰安市中心医院消化内科
  • 出版日期:2017-03-25
  • 通信作者: 张焕轶

Correlation study of deceleration capacity of heart rate, fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography, hsCRP and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation

Wei Song1, Fazhan Zhou1, Wenju Yan1, Zhongxiu Guo1, Wei Feng2, Huanyi Zhang1,†()   

  1. 1. Depatrment of Cardiology, Taian City Center Hospital, Taian 271000, China
    2. Depatrment of gastroenterology, Taian City Center Hospital, Taian 271000, China
  • Published:2017-03-25
  • Corresponding author: Huanyi Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Huanyi, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

宋玮, 周发展, 闫文菊, 郭忠秀, 丰伟, 张焕轶. 心率减速力、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅及超敏C反应蛋白与心房颤动射频消融术后复发的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2017, 05(01): 7-11.

Wei Song, Fazhan Zhou, Wenju Yan, Zhongxiu Guo, Wei Feng, Huanyi Zhang. Correlation study of deceleration capacity of heart rate, fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography, hsCRP and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Heart and Heart Rhythm(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(01): 7-11.

目的

探讨心率减速力(DC)、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅、超敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)与心房颤动(AF)患者射频消融术后复发的相关性。

方法

选取2015年6月至2016年8月因AF在泰安市中心医院住院并首次行射频消融术患者70例，根据术后随访结果分为未复发组45例，复发组25例。统计两组患者一般资料、DC值、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅及hsCRP并进行比较，建立Logistic回归模型，筛选AF患者射频消融术后复发的危险因素，分别对DC值、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅、hsCRP及两两联合、三者联合进行受试ROC曲线绘制，评价三者对AF术后复发的预测价值。

结果

复发组患者DC值(5.78±0.99)ms、hsCRP(1.85±0.77)mg/L高于未复发组(4.93±0.95)ms、(1.39±0.61)mg/L，体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅(0.095±0.013)mV小于未复发组(0.110±0.017)mV，差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)；经多因素Logistic回归分析显示，DC(OR＝3.99，95%CI：1.36～11.68，P＝0.012)、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅(OR＝0.000，95%CI：0.000～0.000，P＝0.013)、hsCRP(OR＝5.15，95%CI：1.11～23.78，P＝0.036)是AF患者射频消融术后复发的独立危险因素；DC值、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅、hsCRP预测AF术后复发ROC曲线下面积分别为0.731、0.741、0.667，三者联合预测AF射频消融术后复发曲线下面积为0.837，高于各自值及两两联合(P<0.05)。

结论

DC、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅及hsCRP与AF射频消融术后复发具有显著相关性，联合检测三者对预测AF射频消融术后复发具有重要临床价值。

关键词: 心率减速力, f波振幅, 超敏C反应蛋白, 心房颤动, 射频消融
Objective

To investigate the correlation between deceleration capacity of heart rate(DC), fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography, hsCRP and recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF).

Methods

Select the 70 AF patients who was operated with radio frequency catheter ablation for the first time from June 2015 to August 2016.According to the follow-up results, 45 cases were divided into the non-recurrence group and 25 cases in the recurrence group.General information, DC values, fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography, hsCRP of the two groups were collected and compared, establish Logistic regression model, screening of risk factors for AF patients after radiofrequency catheter ablation.DC values, fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography , hsCRP and the combination of the two, the combination of the three subjects were drawn the Receiver operating curve(ROC), to evaluate the predictive value of the combination of the three on the recurrence of the AF patients who was operated with radio frequency catheter ablation.

Results

The DC value(5.78±0.99)ms and hsCRP(1.85±0.77)mg/L in the recurrence group was higher than that in the non recurrence group(4.93±0.95)ms、(1.39±0.61)mg/L. The fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography in the recurrence group(0.095±0.013) mV was less than non recurrence group(0.110±0.017)mV(P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the DC value(OR=3.99, 95%CI: 1.36-11.68, P=0.012), fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography(OR=0.000, 95%CI: 0.000-0.000, P=0.013), hsCRP(OR=5.15, 95%CI: 1.11-23.78, P=0.036)are independent risk factor for recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in patients with AF.The ROC curves of DC, fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography and hsCRP showed AUC were 0.731, 0.741 and 0.667. The ROC curves of combination of the three subjects showed AUC was 0.837, higher than their respective and the combination of the two values (P<0.05).

Conclusion

DC values, fibrillatory wave amplitude on lead V1 of surface electrocardiography and hsCRP had significant correlation with the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after adiofrequency catheter ablation. three combinations had predictive value in atrial AF patients who recurrent after radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Key words: Deceleration capacity of rate, Fibrillatory wave amplitude, High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter radiofrequency ablation
表1 未复发组与复发组基本资料比较
组别 例数 年龄(岁) 男性[例(%)] BMI(kg/m2) 合并高血压[例(%)] 合并冠心病[例(%)] LAAP(mm) LVEF(%)
未复发组 45 57.58±10.03 27(60.00) 24.55±1.56 15(33.33) 22(48.89) 38.8±73.75 59.27±6.17
复发组 25 57.68±9.36 15(60.00) 25.995±1.75 16(64.00) 10(40.00) 40.92±4.15 59.88±8.27
t/χ2值 ? 0.04 0.00 3.54 6.13 0.51 2.11 0.32
P值 ? 0.97 1.00 0.001 0.023 0.617 0.038 0.748
组别 例数 胆固醇(mmol/L) 低密度胆固醇(mmol/L) 同型半胱氨酸(μmol/L) 病程(月) 持续性AF(%) 术前DC(ms) f波平均振幅(mv) hsCRP(mg/L)
未复发组 45 4.88±0.85 2.50±0.53 10.74±2.71 10.29±5.14 17(37.78) 4.93±0.95 0.110±0.017 1.39±0.61
复发组 25 4.86±0.64 2.51±0.65 11.51±4.05 12.56±4.13 17(68.00) 5.78±0.99 0.095±0.013 1.85±0.77
t/χ2值 ? 0.07 0.10 0.86 2.89 5.87 3.53 3.77 2.75
P值 ? 0.945 0.924 0.397 0.033 0.024 0.001 0.000 0.008
表2 AF术后复发因素的多因素Logistic回归分析结果
因素 B S.E. Wald值 P值 OR值(95%CI)
BMI 0.32 0.25 1.64 0.201 1.38(0.26～9.87)
合并高血压 1.13 0.87 1.68 0.195 3.08(0.56～16.91)
LAAP 0.17 0.15 1.26 0.262 1.184(0.88～1.59)
持续性AF 1.86 0.88 4.49 0.034 6.43(1.15～36.97)
病程 0.17 0.09 3.58 0.058 1.19(1.00～1.43)
f波平均振振幅振幅幅 －92.34 37.09 6.20 0.013 0.000(0.000～0.000)
DC 1.38 0.55 6.35 0.012 3.99(1.36～11.68)
hsCRP 1.64 0.78 4.40 0.036 5.15(1.11～23.78)
表3 DC、体表心电图V1导联f波平均振幅及hsCRP对AF射频消融术后复发的预测价值
项目 AUC 界值 敏感度(%) 特异度(%) P值
术前DC 0.731 5.8 56.00 82.22 <0.001
f波平均振幅 0.741 0.11 92.00 46.67 <0.001
hsCRP 0.667 1.8 56.00 80.00 0.021
DC联合f波平均振幅 0.822 ? 72.00 82.22 <0.001
DC联合hsCRP 0.779 ? 60.00 97.78 <0.001
hsCRP联合f波平均振幅 0.778 ? 98.00 46.67 <0.001
三者联合 0.837 ? 64.00 88.89 <0.001
[1]
Disertori M, Lombardi F, Barlera S, et al. Clinical predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence in the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Atrial Fibrillation (GISSI-AF) trial[J]. American Heart Journal, 2010, 159(5): 857-863.
[2]
周自强，胡大一，陈捷，等．中国心房颤动现状的流行病学研究[J]. 中华内科杂志，2004, 43(7)：491-494.
[3]
宋学莲，党懿，齐晓勇．心房颤动经射频消融术后复发因素的研究进展[J]. 中国心血管病研究，2015, 13(4)：298-302.
[4]
Wei W, Ge JB, Zou Y, et al. Anatomical characteristics of pulmonary veins for the prediction of postoperative recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation[J]. Plos One, 2014, 9(4): e93817.
[5]
Kalil C, Bartholomay E, Borges A, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation by use of electroanatomical mapping: efficacy and recurrence factors[J]. Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia, 2014, 11(2): 30-38.
[6]
Scherlag BJ, Yamanashi WS, Schauerte P, et al. Endovascular stimulation within the left pulmonary artery to induce slowing of heart rate and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2002, 54(2): 470-475.
[7]
郭继鸿．猝死预警新技术：连续心率减速力测定[J]. 临床心电学杂志，2012, 21(3)：227-233.
[8]
余敏. F波振幅对持续性房颤射频消融术后复发预测价值研究[D]. 北京：北京协和医学院，2012.
[9]
Roithinger FX, SippensGroenewegen A, Karch MR, et al.Organized activation during atrial fibrillation in man: endocardial and electrocadiographic manifestations[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 1998, 9(5): 451-461.
[10]
4Th ET, Olgin JE. Basic mechanisms of atrial fibrillation[J]. Cardiology Clinics, 2004, 22(1): 9-20.
[11]
Hsu NW, Lin YJ, Tai CT, et al. Frequency analysis of the fibrillatory activity from surface ECG lead V1 and intracardiac recordings: implications for mapping of AF[J]. Europace, 2008, 10(4): 438-443.
[12]
Goudis CA, Kallergis EM, Vardas PE. Extracellular matrix alterations in the atria: insights into the mechanisms and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation[J]. Europace, 2012, 14(5): 623-630.
[13]
Eckstein J, Verheule S, de Groot NM, et al. Mechanisms of perpetuation of atrial fibrillation in chronically dilated atria[J]. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 2008, 97(2-3): 435-451.
[14]
Kornej J, Reinhardt C, Kosiuk J, et al. Response of High-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein to Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Relation with Rhythm Outcome[J]. Plos One, 2011, 7(8): e44165.
[15]
Nishino M, Mori N, Nakamura D, et al. Correlation between inflammation state and successful medical cardioversion using bepridil for refractory atrial fibrillation[J]. J Cardiol, 2013, 62(2): 117-120.
[16]
Sotomi Y, Inoue K, Ito N, et al. Incidence and risk factors for very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation[J]. Europace, 2013, 15(11): 1581-1586.
[1] 张胜男, 苗雅敬, 周虹, 韩高洁, 王静, 仝巧立, 张旭倩, 尹洪宁. 左心耳三维经食管超声测量与Watchman左心耳封堵器大小的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(02): 107-113.
[2] 诸佳玮, 陈强, 王辉阳, 蒋天安. 双极射频活检针在肝粗针活检止血的研发与初步应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(01): 69-74.
[3] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径＜1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[4] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[5] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
[6] 莫鹏, 郭杏春, 梁秀娟, 王耀明. 超声引导与CT引导射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者疗效及预后比较[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 151-154.
[7] 黄淑萍, 龚蓓, 申铁梅, 杨丹莉, 陈秀梅, 李国琪, 李星, 麦爱欢, 钟冰, 广东省护士协会心血管疾病护理分会, 南方心血管护理联盟. 心房颤动患者介入手术围术期护理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 1-9.
[8] 陈轶维, 吴近近, 李奋, 孙彦隽, 郁夏风. 儿童左心耳起源房性心动过速镶嵌治疗一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 185-188.
[9] 付明鹏, 牛国栋, 岑志富, 乔宇, 郭金锐, 郭雨龙, 谢阳, 刘晨, 袁华苑, 刘可, 何姗姗. 三维标测系统指导下国产花瓣状脉冲电场消融系统应用一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 180-184.
[10] 储慧民. 心腔内超声心动图指导下的左心耳封堵术标准流程解析[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 58-58.
[11] 储慧民, 杜先锋. 心腔内超声心动图指导左心耳封堵的规范化标准流程[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 1-5.
[12] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
[13] 文明, 张丽, 谢芳, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 构建胃食管反流病患者发生心房颤动的临床预测模型[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 130-136.
[14] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
[15] 李芳, 戴西望, 王凯, 郭廷昊, 涂江龙. 非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中的治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-397.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号