切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华心脏与心律电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 94 -101. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-6568.2024.02.005

结构性心脏病

卵圆孔未闭封堵治疗单中心经验
宋勇战1, 刘宝龙1, 王萍1, 周登明1, 刘永胜1,()   
  1. 1. 441000 襄阳,湖北文理学院附属医院襄阳市中心医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-26 出版日期:2024-06-25
  • 通信作者: 刘永胜

Single center experience in occlusive treatment of patent foramen ovale

Yongzhan Song1, Baolong Liu1, Ping Wang1, Dengming Zhou1, Yongsheng Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441000, China
  • Received:2023-08-26 Published:2024-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Yongsheng Liu
引用本文:

宋勇战, 刘宝龙, 王萍, 周登明, 刘永胜. 卵圆孔未闭封堵治疗单中心经验[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 94-101.

Yongzhan Song, Baolong Liu, Ping Wang, Dengming Zhou, Yongsheng Liu. Single center experience in occlusive treatment of patent foramen ovale[J]. Chinese Journal of Heart and Heart Rhythm(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(02): 94-101.

目的

评价卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵治疗的有效性、安全性及预后转归。

方法

连续纳入2018年7月至2022年9月在襄阳市中心医院心内科行介入封堵治疗的783例PFO患者。在术前完善经胸超声心动图(TTE)、经胸右心声学造影(cTTErr)、经食管超声心动图(TEE)及经颅多普勒(c-TCD)检查,在术后1、3、6、12个月行TTE检查,必要时复查c-TCD。偏头痛患者在术前及术后1、3、6、12个月时记录患者头痛症状和头痛影响测试问卷6(HIT-6)评分。

结果

783例PFO患者,年龄为(55.5±21.3)岁,其中男占30.0%(235/783)。720(92.0%,720/783)例封堵成功,其中608(77.7%,608/783)例用常规方法通过PFO,112(14.3%,112/783)例经由SWARTZ鞘通过卵圆孔。8(1.0%,8/783)例术中发生心脏穿孔,其中2例行急性心包穿刺引流,6例为少量心包积液未处理。术后3例咯血,其中1例咯血量较多,另2例少量咯血,均在2 d后好转。术后随访(33.8±3.6)个月,633(77.7%,633/783)例达到治愈标准,14(1.8%,14/783)例明显缓解,32(4.1%,32/783)例无效,总有效率为89.9%(647/783)。其中18(4.1%,18/439)例偏头痛患者治疗无效,4(4.8%,4/83)例晕厥患者治疗无效,10(9.4%,10/106)例非特异性症状患者治疗无效。围手术期及最长5年随访过程中未出现封堵器脱落、严重心律失常、股动静脉瘘等并发症。其中48例半年后原有症状不缓解或部分缓解者复查cTTErr仍有右向左分流,追溯患者术前TTE或TEE,均提示患者卵圆孔周边边缘菲薄(剑突下双房切面卵圆孔周边不显影)或合并房间隔膨胀瘤。

结论

PFO患者行封堵治疗严重并发症少,手术成功率高;术前规范评估最为重要,可提高患者症状改善程度,减少并发症;需要研发新型卵圆孔封堵器,以提高封堵效果。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and prognostic regression of occlusion therapy for patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Methods

PFO patients who underwent interventional closure treatment in the Department of Cardiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital from July 2018 to September 2022 were included. Preoperative evaluations included transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), contrast transthoracic echocaidiography of right heart (cTTErr), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and transcranial Doppler ultrasound bubble test (c-TCD). Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using TTE, with additional c-TCD if necessary. Migraine patients recorded headache symptoms and the Headache Impact Test-6 scores before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

A total of 783 PFO patients with age of (55.5±21.3) years, and 30.0% (235/783) male were involved. Seven hundred and twenty patients were successfully occluded with a success rate of 92.0% (720/783). Of these, 608 (77.7%, 608/783) patients were passed through the PFO using the conventional approach, and 112 (14.3%, 112/783) using the SWARTZ sheath. Intraoperative cardiac perforation occurred in 8 (1.0%, 8/783) patients, acute pericardiocentesis in 2 patients, and a small amount of pericardial effusion was left untreated in 6 patients. Postoperatively, 3 patients coughed up blood, including 1 case with a large amount of blood and the other 2 patients with a small amount of blood, all of which improved after 2 days. Postoperative follow-up was (33.8±3.6) months. During the follow-up, 633 (77.7%, 633/783) patients were found to have reached the cure standard, 14 (1.8%, 14/783) significantly relieved, and 32 (4.1%, 32/783) ineffective, with an overall effective rate of 89.9% (647/783). Among them, 18 (4.1%, 18/439) patients with migraine were ineffective, 4 (4.8%, 4/83) with syncope were ineffective, and 10 (9.4%, 10/106) with nonspecific symptoms were ineffective. There were no complications such as blocker dislodgement, severe arrhythmia, femoral arteriovenous fistula, etc. during the perioperative period and up to 5-year follow-up. Forty eight patients had no relief or partial relief of their original symptoms after 6 months of follow-up. Their cTTErr was reviewed, and they still had residual right to left shunt. Tracing the patients' preoperative TTE or TEE suggested that the patients had thin peripheral margins of the foramen ovale (peripheral periphery of the foramen ovale was not visualized in the subxiphoid biatrial view) or combined with atrial septal aneurysm.

Conclusion

Patients with PFO undergoing occlusion therapy have fewer serious complications and a high rate of surgical success. Standardized preoperative evaluation is of utmost importance to improve the degree of symptomatic improvement and reduce complications in patients. There is a need to develop new types of patent foramen ovale occluders to improve the effectiveness of occlusion.

表1 卵圆孔未闭患者不同症状构成及随访情况
图1 1例13岁患儿的影像学资料(1A为患儿术前经胸右心声学造影示大量右向左分流;1B为术中选择18 mm/25 mm PFO封堵器进行封堵)
图2 1例有晕厥史的卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的特种兵患者的影像学资料(2A为患者PFO封堵2年后经胸右心声学造影仍示阳性,中量右向左分流;2B为术中反复尝试SWARTZ鞘,冠状动脉导丝及加硬导丝,均未能成功穿过PFO)
图3 1例合并软边的卵圆孔未闭(PFO)患者影像学资料(3A为术前经胸超声心电图剑突下双心房切面示患者PFO周边房间隔回声明显减低,提示边缘菲薄;3B为术前经胸右心声学造影示患者中到大量右向左分流;3C为术前经食管超声心动图示患者PFO,周边边缘菲薄;3D为术中使用12 mm房间隔缺损封堵器成功封堵PFO,封堵器成型好,位置稳固;蓝色箭头为PFO周边房间隔回声减低、红色箭头为PFO)
图4 1例合并房间隔膨胀瘤(ASA)的卵圆孔未闭(PFO)患者影像学资料(4A为术前经胸超声心动图剑突下双心房切面示ASA形成,PFO周边边缘菲薄;4B为术前经胸右心声学造影示卵圆孔中量右向左分流:4C为术前经食管超声心动图示PFO合并ASA形成,房间隔异常凸向左心房,提示房间隔摆动幅度大;4D为术中使用10 mm小腰大边房间隔封堵器成功封堵PFO,封堵器成型好,位置稳固。蓝色箭头为PFO合并ASA,红色箭头为隆起的房间隔凸向左心房;LA为左心房,RA为右心房)
图5 设计中的软边卵圆孔封堵器软边卵圆孔封堵器:可以根据软边的长度或房间隔膨胀瘤的长度选择相应封堵器,以覆盖软边或房间隔,达到完全封堵卵圆孔未闭、减少封堵后房间隔摆动的目的
[1]
Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 39(12):1890-1900.
[2]
Mac Grory B, Ohman EM, Feng W, et al. Advances in the management of cardioembolic stroke associated with patent foramen ovale[J]. BMJ, 2022, 376:e063161.
[3]
Zhang Y, Wang H, Liu L. Patent foramen ovale closure for treating migraine: a meta-analysis[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2022, 2022:6456272.
[4]
Shah AH, Osten M, Leventhal A, et al. Percutaneous intervention to treat platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome: the Toronto experience[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(18):1928-1938.
[5]
Brogno D, Lancaster G, Rosenbaum M. Embolism interruptus[J]. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330(24):1761-1762.
[6]
Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(7):2160-2236.
[7]
Gonnah AR, Bharadwaj MS, Nassar H, et al. Patent foramen ovale: diagnostic evaluation and the role of device closure[J]. Clin Med (Lond), 2022, 22(5):441-448.
[8]
中华医学会心血管内科分会, 中国医师协会心血管内科分会. 卵圆孔未闭预防性封堵术中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2017, 32(3):209-214.
[9]
Fenster BE, Nguyen BH, Buckner JK, et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for hypoxemia[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2013, 112(8):1258-1262.
[10]
Kleber FX, Hauschild T, Schulz A, et al. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction caused by presumed paradoxical embolism via a patent foramen ovale[J]. Circ J, 2017, 81(10):1484-1489.
[11]
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition[J]. Cephalalgia, 2018, 38(1):1-211.
[12]
Zuber M, Cuculi F, Oechslin E, et al. Is transesophageal echocardiography still necessary to exclude patent foramen ovale?[J]. Scand Cardiovasc J, 2008, 42(3):222-225.
[13]
Houts CR, Wirth RJ, McGinley JS, et al. Determining thresholds for meaningful change for the headache impact test (HIT-6) total and item-specific scores in chronic migraine[J]. Headache, 2020, 60(9):2003-2013.
[14]
Kent DM, Dahabreh IJ, Ruthazer R, et al. Device closure of patent foramen ovale after stroke: pooled analysis of completed randomized trials[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 67(8):907-917.
[15]
Mojadidi MK, Kumar P, Mahmoud AN, et al. Pooled analysis of PFO occluder device trials in patients with PFO and migraine[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(6):667-676.
[16]
Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, et al. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 377(11):1022-1032.
[17]
Lanzone AM, Albiero R, Boldi E, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a single center experience[J]. Minerva Cardiol Angiol, 2023, 71(2):157-164.
[18]
Devendra GP, Rane AA, Krasuski RA. Provoked exercise desaturation in patent foramen ovale and impact of percutaneous closure[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5(4):416-419.
[19]
Klein MR, Kiefer TL, Velazquez EJ. Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome: to shunt or not to shunt, that is the question[J]. Tex Heart Inst J, 2016, 43(3):264-266.
[20]
Kleber FX, Hauschild T, Schulz A, et al. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction caused by presumed paradoxical embolism via a patent foramen ovale[J]. Circ J, 2017, 81(10):1484-1489.
[21]
Elzanaty AM, Patel N, Sabbagh E, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure in the management of cryptogenic stroke: a review of current literature and guideline statements[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2021, 37(3):377-384.
[22]
Lee EH, Han MY. Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure in a child with cryptogenic ischemic stroke[J]. Indian J Pediatr, 2020, 87(8):653.
[23]
Mojadidi MK, Kumar P, Mahmoud AN, et al. Pooled analysis of PFO occluder device trials in patients with PFO and migraine[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(6):667-676.
[24]
Wang YL, Wang FZ, Zhang Y, et al. Association of migraine with patent foramen ovale closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, 2022, 39:100992.
[25]
Sommer RJ, Nazif T, Privitera L, et al. Retrospective review of thienopyridine therapy in migraineurs with patent foramen ovale[J]. Neurology, 2018, 91(22):1002-1009.
[26]
Reisman AM, Robbins BT, Chou DE, et al. Ticagrelor for refractory migraine/patent foramen ovale (TRACTOR): An open-label pilot study[J]. Neurology, 2018, 91(22):1010-1017.
[27]
Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017,377(11):1011-1021.
[28]
Tobis JM, Charles A, Silberstein SD, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with migraine: The PREMIUM trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(22):2766-2774.
[29]
张婷婷,张玉顺,万陈,等. 过大房间隔缺损封堵器对犬术后内皮化的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志, 2014,42(7):557-560.
[30]
Tanabe Y, Suzuki T, Kuwata S, et al. Angioscopic evaluation of atrial septal defect closure device neo-endothelialization[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2021, 10(18):e019282.
[31]
Kasner SE, Swaminathan B, Lavados P, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2018, 17(12):1053-1060.
[32]
Nakayama R, Takaya Y, Akagi T, et al. Identification of high-risk patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke: development of a scoring system[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2019, 32(7):811-816.
[33]
Apostolos A, Drakopoulou M, Trantalis G, et al. Is every PFO technically appropriate for transcatheter closure?[J]. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2022, 67:85-86.
[34]
Vizzari G, Pizzino F, Zwicke D, et al. Patent foramen ovale: anatomical complexity and long-tunnel morphology related issues[J]. Am J Cardiovasc Dis, 2021, 11(3):316-329.
[35]
Vitarelli A, Mangieri E, Capotosto L, et al. Echocardiographic findings in simple and complex patent foramen ovale before and after transcatheter closure[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 15(12):1377-1385.
[36]
Thompson AJ, Hagler DJ, Taggart NW. Transseptal puncture to facilitate device closure of "long-tunnel" patent foramen ovale[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 85(6):1053-1057.
[1] 王一茹, 邓玉姣, 阳开秀, 伊海瑞, 罗渝昆, 李越. 卵圆孔未闭经胸超声心动图声学造影及经食管超声心动图的单中心诊断数据分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(06): 546-551.
[2] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
阅读次数
全文


摘要