切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华心脏与心律电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 71 -76. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-6568.2026.02.002

年度报告

2025年心脏生理性起搏年度报告
邹建刚†(), 曾嘉欣, 侯小锋, 王垚, 钱智勇, 张新尉   
  1. 210029 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院(江苏省人民医院)心血管内科
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-09 出版日期:2026-06-25
  • 通信作者: 邹建刚
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82470529)

Cardiac physiologic pacing: advances in 2025

Jiangang Zou†(), Jiaxin Zeng, Xiaofeng Hou, Yao Wang, Zhiyong Qian, Xinwei Zhang   

  1. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital), Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2026-03-09 Published:2026-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Jiangang Zou
引用本文:

邹建刚, 曾嘉欣, 侯小锋, 王垚, 钱智勇, 张新尉. 2025年心脏生理性起搏年度报告[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 71-76.

Jiangang Zou, Jiaxin Zeng, Xiaofeng Hou, Yao Wang, Zhiyong Qian, Xinwei Zhang. Cardiac physiologic pacing: advances in 2025[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Heart and Heart Rhythm(Electronic Edition), 2026, 14(02): 71-76.

心脏生理性起搏旨在恢复或接近心脏自然传导与激动模式,其中以希氏束起搏和左束支起搏(LBBP)为代表的传导系统起搏(CSP)近年来发展迅速。2025年,多项随机对照研究及真实世界研究进一步丰富了CSP的循证证据。在心动过缓患者中,CSP较传统右心室起搏在维持左心室功能及降低起搏相关心肌病方面显示出潜在优势;在心力衰竭及心脏再同步治疗人群中,CSP与双心室起搏对比的研究数据不断积累,并进一步探索了LBBP优化的心脏再同步治疗等联合策略的应用价值。同时,围绕导线可靠性、除颤导线用于LBBP、无导线CSP及心房生理性起搏等方面的技术与器械创新持续推进。总体而言,CSP正逐步推动起搏治疗向更生理化与更精准化方向发展,但其长期疗效及最佳适应证仍需更多高质量研究进一步验证。

Cardiac physiologic pacing aims to restore or approximate the cardiac native conduction and activation pattern. Among these strategies, conduction system pacing (CSP), represented by His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), has developed rapidly in recent years. In 2025, several randomized controlled trials and real-world studies further strengthened the evidence base for CSP. In patients with bradycardia, CSP has shown potential advantages over right ventricular pacing in preserving left ventricular function and reducing the incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. In patients with heart failure and those indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy, comparative data between CSP and biventricular pacing continue to accumulate, and the potential value of combined strategies such as LBBP-optimized CRT is being further explored. Meanwhile, technological and device innovations are advancing in areas such as lead reliability, the use of defibrillation leads for LBBP, leadless CSP systems, and physiological atrial pacing. Overall, CSP is progressively driving pacing therapy toward a more physiological and precision-oriented approach. However, its long-term outcomes and optimal indications still require further confirmation through high-quality studies.

[1]
Whinnett Z, Naraen A, Vijayaraman P, et al. Physiological pacing: mechanisms, clinical indications, and perspectives[J]. Eur Heart J. 2025. 46(35): 3407-3419.
[2]
Glikson M, Burri H, Abdin A, et al. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing, with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society[J]. Europace, 2025, 27(4):euaf050.
[3]
Russo AM, Desai MY, Do MM, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2025 Appropriate use criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, cardiac resynchro- nization therapy, and pacing[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2025, 85(11): 1213-1285.
[4]
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(35): 3427-3520.
[5]
Burri H, Jastrzebski M, Cano Ó, et al. EHRA Clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)[J]. Europace, 2023, 25(4): 1208-1236.
[6]
Chow C, Wong C, Sutherland N, et al. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing vs right ventricular septal pacing in atrioventricular block: the CSPACE randomized controlled trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2025, 86(8): 563-573.
[7]
Curila K, Mizner J, Morava J, et al. Prospective randomized trial of conduction system pacing vs right ventricular pacing for patients with atrioventricular block; Prague CSP trial[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2025, 22(10): e894-e902.
[8]
Jastrzębski M, Kiełbasa G, Cano O, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing vs right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: the MELOS RELOADED study[J]. Eur Heart J, 2026, 47(13): 1541-1550.
[9]
Pujol-López M, Graterol FR, Borràs R, et al. Clinical response to resynchronization therapy: conduction system pacing vs biventricular pacing: the CONSYST-CRT trial[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 2025, 11(8): 1820-1831.
[10]
Zimerman A, Dal Forno A, Rohde LE, et al. Conduction system pacing vs biventricular resynchronization in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block: rationale and design of the PhysioSync-HF trial[J]. Am Heart J, 2025, 290: 38-45.
[11]
Xue S, He C, Zou F, et al. Left ventricular septal pacing combined with left ventricular pacing improves acute electric resynchronization, hemodynamic responses and clinical outcomes: results of SPORT study[J]. 2025, 27(8): euaf147.
[12]
Upadhyay GA, Jastrzębski M, Foley P, et al. Echocardiographic response from left bundle branch area pacing optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) vs traditional CRT[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2025, 22(10): 2616-2624.
[13]
Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2001, 12(8): 912-917.
[14]
Infeld M, Habel N, Wahlberg K, et al. Bachmann bundle potential during atrial lead placement: a case series[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2022, 19(3): 490-494.
[15]
Infeld M, Nicoli CD, Meagher S, et al. Clinical impact of Bachmann's bundle pacing defined by electrocardio graphic criteria on atrial arrhythmia outcomes[J]. Europace, 2022, 24(9): 1460-1468.
[16]
Subramanian M, Yalagudri S, Saggu DK, et al. Accelerated Bachmann bundle area pacing for atrial resynchronization in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized crossover trial[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2025, 22(11): 2757-2765.
[17]
Qiu Z, Wu X, Hu W, et al. Interatrial synchronized pacing at the posterosuperior bundle: feasibility, mechanism, and mid-term outcomes[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2026, 19(1): e014357.
[18]
De Pooter J, Breitenstein A, Özpak E, et al. Lead integrity and failure evaluation in left bundle branch area pacing: the LIFE-LBBAP study[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 2025, 11(1): 158-170.
[19]
Reddy VY, Nair DG, Doshi SK, et al. First-in-human study of a leadless pacemaker system for left bundle branch area pacing[J]. Heart Rhythm. 2025. 22(8): 2010-2017.
[20]
Vijayaraman P, Liu X, Denman R, et al. Safety and performance of a novel defibrillation lead for left bundle branch area placement: primary results of the LEADR LBBAP clinical trial[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2025, S1547-5271(25)02981-9.
[21]
张亚梅, 郑盛泷, 苏蓝. 希氏-浦肯野系统起搏挑战病例的植入策略[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(3): 140-148.
[22]
朱凯伦, 李琳琳, 李桂阳, 柳江海, 常栋, 李强. 左束支起搏对合并右束支传导阻滞患者的心电学影响[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2022, 10(3): 165-170.
[1] 徐颖, 宋雨, 黄欣, 周易冬, 孙强, 林燕. 精准医学时代局部晚期乳腺癌的诊治热点[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 139-144.
[2] 朱洪浩, 邢晨, 张少玲, 江春, 范新祥, 董文, 孔坚秋. 人工智能在肾上腺肿瘤诊疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 581-587.
[3] 田超, 黄若曦, 蒋茂林, 谢崇伟, 刁鹏飞, 钟苏权, 陈东, 王航涛, 陈桂柳, 陈虞娟, 李国良. 不同亚型前列腺癌新辅助化疗后盆腔淋巴结转移的风险因素及时间分布[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 727-735.
[4] 宋小飞, 巫嘉文, 孙阳. 后腹腔镜上尿路手术中良性大体积标本体内分块取出技术的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 720-726.
[5] 张轶普, 耿霄, 王鑫光, 董子漾, 郑宇航, 田华. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与单髁关节置换术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 114-122.
[6] 苏生林, 马金兰, 于弘明, 杨晓军. 单细胞测序技术在脓毒症免疫研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 279-286.
[7] 齐洪武, 徐泽雨. 脑脓肿的临床诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 327-331.
[8] 王宁, 李延, 陈学智. 左束支起搏对比右室起搏对三尖瓣反流的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 8-13.
[9] 苏艳玲, 禹子清, 梁义秀. 无创血流动力学监测指导左束支起搏优化心脏再同步治疗一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 250-252.
[10] 李小梅. 儿童心脏起搏治疗现状及进展[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 111-115.
[11] 李霞玲, 朱小刚, 胡文泽, 杨明, 佟子川. 胸痛左束支阻滞综合征的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 47-53.
[12] 曾嘉欣, 邹建刚. 左束支夺获的判断方法与临床意义[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 225-233.
[13] 魏冰倩, 蓝荣芳. 起搏诱导心肌病应对新策略:导线移除与希氏-浦肯野系统起搏升级[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-160.
[14] 张亚梅, 郑盛泷, 苏蓝. 希氏-浦肯野系统起搏挑战病例的植入策略[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 140-148.
[15] 王昊杰, 习璞, 申晓军. 《人工智能在代谢减重外科中的现状和未来前景的国际专家共识》解读:基于28项共识声明的证据分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 257-262.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?