切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华心脏与心律电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 238 -245. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-6568.2022.04.009

所属专题: 总编推荐

心房颤动

肌酐清除率与中国急诊非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的预后研究
张涛1, 王娟1, 杨艳敏1,(), 朱俊1, 张晗1, 邵兴慧1   
  1. 1. 100037 北京,中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 国家心血管病中心 心血管疾病国家重点实验室 阜外医院心内科急重症中心
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-16 出版日期:2022-12-25
  • 通信作者: 杨艳敏
  • 基金资助:
    首都临床诊疗技术研究及示范应用(Z191100006619121); 阜外医院院所青年基金(2022FWQN18)

Creatinine clearance and prognosis of Chinese emergency patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Tao Zhang1, Juan Wang1, Yanmin Yang1,(), Jun Zhu1, Han Zhang1, Xinghui Shao1   

  1. 1. Emergency and Intensive Care Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
  • Received:2022-06-16 Published:2022-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Yanmin Yang
引用本文:

张涛, 王娟, 杨艳敏, 朱俊, 张晗, 邵兴慧. 肌酐清除率与中国急诊非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的预后研究[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 238-245.

Tao Zhang, Juan Wang, Yanmin Yang, Jun Zhu, Han Zhang, Xinghui Shao. Creatinine clearance and prognosis of Chinese emergency patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation[J]. Chinese Journal of Heart and Heart Rhythm(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(04): 238-245.

目的

探讨肌酐清除率(CrCl)与中国急诊非瓣膜性心房颤动(房颤)患者预后的影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入2008年11月至2011年10月在中国20家医院急诊就诊的房颤患者,并随访1年。根据CrCl水平,将患者分为4组:CrCl≥80 ml/min组、50 ml/min≤CrCl<80 ml/min组、30 ml/min≤CrCl<50 ml/min组和CrCl<30 ml/min组。主要临床终点事件为全因死亡、心血管死亡、血栓栓塞和大出血事件。应用Cox回归模型分析不同CrCl水平对主要临床终点事件的影响。

结果

共入选863例非瓣膜性房颤患者,年龄为(69.4±13.8)岁,其中女性占57.6%(495/863),基线CrCl为(52.9±24.5) ml/min。1年随访中,126(14.6%,126/863)例患者死亡,不同CrCl组间患者死亡率差异具有统计学意义(3.2%对6.5%对16.2%对40.2%,P<0.001)。心血管死亡和血栓栓塞发生率亦随着CrCl水平的降低而增加。在多因素Cox分析中,与CrCl≥80 ml/min组相比,CrCl<30 ml/min组患者的全因死亡(HR=5.567, 95%CI 1.618~19.876,P=0.007)和心血管死亡(HR=11.939, 95%CI 1.439~99.031, P=0.022)风险最高。但对于血栓栓塞和大出血风险,经多因素校正后,不同CrCl组间差异无统计学意义。

结论

在中国急诊非瓣膜性房颤患者中,全因死亡随着CrCl的降低而增加。CrCl<30 ml/min是全因死亡和心血管死亡的独立危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the effect of creatinine clearance (CrCl) on the prognosis of Chinese emergency department (ED) non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

Methods

This study prospectively enrolled patients with AF who presented to the ED of 20 hospitals in China from November 2008 to October 2011, and were followed up for 1 year. According to the level of CrCl, the patients were divided into 4 groups: CrCl≥80 ml/min, 50 ml/min≤CrCl<80 ml/min, 30 ml/min≤CrCl<50 ml/min and CrCl<30 ml/min. The primary clinical endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, thromboembolism, and major bleeding. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze the effects of different CrCl groups on the above events.

Results

In this study, 863 patients with non-valvular AF were selected as the research subjects. The average age of the patients was (69.4±13.8) years, 57.6% (495/863) were female, and the mean baseline CrCl was (52.9±24.5) ml/min. During 1-year follow-up, 126 (14.6%) patients died.The difference of the all-cause death among the four groups was significant (3.2% vs.6.5% vs.16.2% vs.40.2%, P<0.001). Cardiovascular death and thromboembolic rates also increased with decreasing CrCl levels. In multivariate Cox analysis, all-cause death (HR=5.567; 95%CI 1.618-19.876, P=0.007) and cardiovascular death (HR=11.939; 95%CI 1.439-99.031, P=0.022) risk was highest in CrCl<30 ml/min category, compared with the group CrCl≥80 ml/min. However, for the risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding, after multivariate adjustment, no significant difference was found between the different CrCl groups.

Conclusion

Among Chinese ED non-valvular AF patients, all-cause mortality increased with a decrease in CrCl. CrCl<30 ml/min was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

表1 不同肌酐清除率组间患者基线特征和药物应用情况
项目 CrCl≥80ml/min 50≤CrCl<80ml/min 30≤CrCl<50ml/min CrCl<30ml/min P
例数 95 339 297 132
年龄(岁,
x¯±s
49.8±14.5 55.5±11.2 75.5±9.8 77.1±10.9 <0.001
女性[例(%)] 47(49.5) 196(57.8) 171(57.6) 81(61.4) 0.346
体重(kg,
x¯±s
72.2±12.8 66.0±10.7 62.66±10.66 59.9±10.1 <0.001
收缩压(mmHg,
x¯±s
123.0±19.3 129.9±22.9 134.1±24.5 137.1±25.3 <0.001
舒张压(mmHg,
x¯±s
79.2±13.1 80.1±15.4 79.3±15.8 78.9±15.0 0.837
心率(次/min,
x¯±s
103.9±33.9 105.7±29.8 101.5±30.2 104.8±31.0 0.359
CHA2DS2-VASc评分(分,
x¯±s
1.7±1.7 3.2±1.9 4.5±1.8 4.6±1.9 <0.001
HAS-BLED评分(分,
x¯±s
0.9±0.8 1.6±1.0 2.0±0.9 2.4±0.9 <0.001
吸烟史[例(%)] 21(22.1) 62(18.3) 45(15.2) 22(16.7) 0.432
饮酒史[例(%)] 15(15.8) 22(6.5) 7(2.4) 9(6.8) <0.001
心房颤动类型[例(%)] <0.001

阵发性心房颤动

42 (44.2) 138 (40.7) 88 (29.6) 27 (20.5)

持续性心房颤动

23 (24.2) 68 (20.1) 57 (19.2) 36 (27.3)

永久性心房颤动

30 (31.6) 133 (39.2) 152 (51.2) 69 (52.3)
合并疾病[例(%)]

冠心病

23(24.2) 120(35.4) 162(54.5) 71(53.8) <0.001

陈旧心肌梗死

5(5.3) 28(8.3) 33(11.1) 15(11.4) 0.256

心力衰竭

20(21.1) 107(31.6) 94(31.6) 48 (36.4) 0.100

先天性心脏病

4(4.2) 9(2.7) 4(1.3) 3(2.3) 0.405

高血压

30(31.6) 184(54.3) 209(69.4) 93(70.5) <0.001

糖尿病

7(7.4) 54(15.9) 72(24.2) 26(19.7) 0.01

卒中或TIA史

11(11.6) 69(20.4) 90(30.3) 39(29.5) <0.001

大出血史

1(1.1) 111(3.2) 2(0.7) 5(3.8) 0.070

痴呆/认知障碍

1(1.1) 6(1.8) 0 8(6.1) <0.001

COPD

7(7.4) 34(10.0) 52(17.5) 21(15.9) 0.010

睡眠呼吸暂停

5(5.3) 11(3.2) 7(2.4) 3(2.3) 0.495

甲状腺功能亢进

5(5.3) 8(2.4) 10(3.4) 4(3.0) 0.542
药物[例(%)]

华法林

31(32.6) 71(20.9) 54 (18.2) 54 (18.2) 0.008

TTR≥70%

13(13.7) 37(10.9) 22(7.4) 7(5.3) 0.014

抗血小板药

52(54.7) 234(69.0) 195(65.7) 81(61.4) 0.054

β受体阻断滞剂

54(56.8) 189(55.8) 162(54.5) 69(52.3) 0.890

钙通道阻滞剂

14(14.7) 107(31.6) 117(39.4) 47(35.6) <0.001

地高辛

27(28.4) 100(29.5) 76(25.6) 38(28.8) 0.733

抗心律失常药

14(14.7) 61(18.0) 26(8.8) 11(8.3) 0.002

利尿剂

24(25.3) 1119(35.1) 114(38.4) 60 (45.5) 0.015

ACEI/ARB

28(29.5) 138(40.7) 129(43.3) 51(38.6) 0.111

他汀类

20(21.1) 110(32.4) 130(43.8) 40(30.3) <0.001
图1 不同肌酐清除率组患者1年随访的临床终点事件发生率的比较[1A为四组间全因死亡率的比较;1B为四组间心血管死亡率的比较;1C为四组间血栓栓塞发生率的比较;1D为四组间大出血发生率的比较]CrCl为肌酐清除率(单位为ml/min)
图2 不同肌酐清除率组患者1年随访主要终点事件的Kaplan-Meyer曲线[2A为四组间全因死亡的累积生存分析比较;2B为四组间心血管死亡的累积生存分析比较;2C为四组间血栓栓塞累积风险的比较;2D为四组间大出血累积风险的比较]Crcl为肌酐清除率(单位为ml/min)
表2 单因素Cox分析肌酐清除率对临床终点事件的影响
图3 多因素Cox回归模型分析临床终点事件的独立危险因素[3A为全因死亡的独立危险因素分析;3B为心血管死亡的独立危险因素分析;3C为血栓栓塞的独立危险因素分析;3D为大出血累积风险的独立危险因素分析]
[1]
Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the american heart association[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(8):e153-e639.
[2]
中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2020概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2021, 36(6):521-545.
[3]
Potpara TS, Ferro CJ, Lip G. Use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2018, 14(5):337-351.
[4]
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(5):373-498.
[5]
Wang Y, Yang Y, He F. Insights into concomitant atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease[J]. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 23(3):105.
[6]
Steffel J, Collins R, Antz M, et al. 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in pPatients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Europace, 2021, 23(10):1612-1676.
[7]
Kodani E, Inoue H, Atarashi H, et al. Predictive ability of creatinine clearance versus estimated glomerular filtration rate for outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry[J]. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, 2020, 29:100559.
[8]
Kodani E, Atarashi H, Inoue H, et al. Impact of creatinine clearance on outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry[J]. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes, 2018, 4(1):59-68.
[9]
Yuzawa Y, Kuronuma K, Okumura Y, et al. Relationship between the renal function and adverse clinical events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a japanese multicenter registry substudy[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(1):167.
[10]
杨艳敏, 张晗, 朱俊,等. 中国急诊心房颤动注册研究:基线资料及治疗情况分析[J]. 中华心律失常学杂志, 2019(1):12-17.
[11]
杨艳敏, 邵兴慧, 朱俊,等. 中国急诊室心房颤动注册研究:一年随访结果分析[J]. 中华心律失常学杂志, 2020, 24(4):376-381.
[12]
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine[J]. Nephron, 1976, 16(1):31-41.
[13]
Hohnloser SH, Hijazi Z, Thomas L, et al. Efficacy of apixaban when compared with warfarin in relation to renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial[J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(22):2821-2830.
[14]
Ding WY, Potpara TS, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. Impact of renal impairment on atrial fibrillation: ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2022, 52(6):e13745.
[15]
Li S T, Jiang C, He L, et al. Chronic kidney disease and risks of adverse clinical events in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2021, 18(11):867-876.
[16]
Goto S, Angchaisuksiri P, Bassand JP, et al. Management and 1-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: results from the prospective GARFIELD - AF registry[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2019, 8(3):e010510.
[17]
Fauchier L, Bisson A, Clementy N, et al. Changes in glomerular filtration rate and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Am Heart J, 2018, 198:39-45.
[18]
Go A S, Fang M C, Udaltsova N, et al. Impact of proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate on risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study[J]. Circulation, 2009, 119(10):1363-1369.
[19]
Banerjee A, Fauchier L, Vourc'h P, et al. A prospective study of estimated glomerular filtration rate and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project[J]. Chest, 2014, 145(6):1370-1382.
[20]
Abe M, Ogawa H, Ishii M, et al. Relation of stroke and major bleeding to creatinine clearance in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the Fushimi AF Registry)[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2017, 119(8):1229-1237.
[21]
Piccini J P, Stevens S R, Chang Y, et al. Renal dysfunction as a predictor of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: validation of the R(2)CHADS(2) index in the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) and ATRIA (AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation) study cohorts[J]. Circulation, 2013, 127(2):224-232.
[22]
Roldán V, Marín F, Manzano-Fernandez S, et al. Does chronic kidney disease improve the predictive value of the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc stroke stratification risk scores for atrial fibrillation?[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2013, 109(5):956-960.
[23]
Pisters R, Lane D A, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the euro heart survey[J]. Chest, 2010, 138(5):1093-1100.
[24]
Ocak G, Khairoun M, Khairoun O, et al. Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: a dangerous combination[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(4):e0266046.
[1] 刘丹妮, 敖梦, 冉海涛, 李世玉, 秦芳. 三维超声心动图及二维斑点追踪成像对持续性心房颤动复律后双心房逆向重构的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 827-835.
[2] 陈永庄, 莫小乔, 谢天. 心血管事件患者术后30 d死亡风险决策树模型的构建与评估——基于少数类样本合成过采样技术算法[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 390-398.
[3] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[4] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[5] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[6] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[7] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[8] 江文诗, 何湘湘. 全球及我国器官捐献发展特征分析与学科建设[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 280-286.
[9] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[10] 刘恒, 侯宇川. 膀胱癌新型灌注药物的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 445-451.
[11] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[12] 吉茜茜, 田尧, 马林, 钱进. 红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值联合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡率的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 433-438.
[13] 邓世栋, 刘凌志, 郭大勇, 王超, 黄忠欣, 张晖辉. 沉默SNHG1基因对膀胱癌细胞增殖、凋亡、迁移和铁死亡的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 804-811.
[14] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
[15] 边震, 宋绍永, 杨国旺, 范凤尾, 黄庆红, 李健, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期危机状况的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 499-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要