To investigate the anesthetic method and anesthetic effect of cesarean section in pregnant women with cardiac disease.

60 pregnant women with heart disease were randomly selected from our hospital in February 2017-2018 February.The patients were randomly divided into general anesthesia group and epidural anesthesia group.30 cases each.The vital signs of the two groups were compared, and the neonatal Apgar score was compared.

before operation, the heart rate of the general anesthesia group was(97.6±4.4)times/min, and the epidural anesthesia group was(77.3±5.6)times/min(P<0.05). The heart rate of patients in general anesthesia group before and after fetal removal was significantly higher than that before epidural anesthesia, which was also higher than that before anesthesia, P<0.05.The central venous pressure of the patients in the general anesthesia group was(109.8±4.2)P/mmHg, which was higher than that before and before the operation, and was also higher than that in the epidural anesthesia group(P<0.05). In general anesthesia group, neonatal Apgar score was normal in 22 cases, epidural anesthesia group in 29 cases, P<0.05.

continuous epidural anesthesia is more conducive to stabilize the vital signs of patients, and has a higher advantage.